Artwork: (c) Hugh MacLeod (Twitter, Blog)

I just received an Education Week email update and the second article listed was this one written by Betty J. Sternberg. She begins the article:

Consider this description of the work environment of California-based Meebo, one of the Web’s fastest-growing messaging companies, and then ask yourself if today’s classrooms can be described the same way:

“A great team, and tons of meaty problems to solve. … It’s open, collaborative. … We’re facing problems that are pretty unusual. … We take the smartest and most passionate team-oriented people we can find and put them in an environment where they can thrive. We value innovation, teamwork, and good clean fun. … We’re still a small company, so one person can make a big impact.” (more…)

I came across the following statement at the AASLS Smackdown wiki this morning:

According to The Associated Colleges of the South, “using critical thinking skills and appropriate technologies, information fluency integrates the abilities to:

  • collect the information necessary to consider a problem or issue
  • employ critical thinking skills in the evaluation and analysis of the information and its sources
  • formulate logical conclusions and present those conclusions in an appropriate and effective way” – Information Age Inquiry (more…)

I rarely find myself disagreeing with an idea that Dr. Scott McLeod places on the table, but this one raised my hackles a bit. I have always positioned myself as an avid anti-standardized testing professional. However, when I finished reading his piece I thought I would take a breath, step back, and consider it before responding. The argument played out in my thoughts this way:

“We must take ownership of our own culpability.”

The reaction to this statement was, “As teachers we have very little voice in the profession we work in.” That is the voice of the un-empowered. Where does it come from?

I contend that it occurs because society does not see teachers as practitioners. The power to conceive and architect learning is not often afforded to teachers. They are encouraged to take the pre-packaged materials and be creative, but not allowed to ask themselves and their students the question, “What is worth knowing?” (more…)

I was reading my Google Reader feeds yesterday and came across one by Todd Lucier at The Clever Sheep. His thought highlighted a constant refrain that seems to permeate education, “When have we arrived?”

Todd’s assessment about the effects of the change factor in education is spot-on. The situation is more acute than in many other areas of society, caused by education’s lagging behind the wave of change that is constantly sweeping over us. I am not sure if Todd was musing or lamenting, but the “end points” he mentioned are an underlying changeimageproblem, which impedes any progress in educational change. The idea of an “end point” stifles possibility by suggesting that a perfect destination is quantifiable. The real question is, “Is there really ever a destination to be arrived at?” Politicians and society in general want schools to “arrive” so they can be comfortable in sending their children inside those walls. This perpetuates the idea of a final destination where we can all sit back, breathe a sigh of relief, and proclaim, “We have arrived. (more…)

I am days away from completing a two semester program that will take me in a new career direction. That is both happy and sad. I love learning and being able to keep intellectually challenged, I will miss  that. However, I love new challenges and looking at the unknown horizion, map in hand.

A significant part of my plan is to return to my blog and be more focused in my writing. Though the map is heading me toward the legal and policy side of education, my heart remains in the classroom, with students, and hearing the voices in the marketplace of ideas among my Twitter and FB educator friends. I hope to be, even tangentially, a voice of revolutionary thought in the rethinking of American education.

@tylerbreed tweeted a link this morning to one of my favorite blogs (which due to my own course work I haven’t kept up with since last September) and I received a nice shot of invigoration from the thoughts in David Warlick’s post: The Continerless Learning Environment. (more…)

One of my former eighth grade students is in her junior year and studying education . . . she contacted me via Facebook and asked for my responses to a series of questions in an area I have always had an interest in. I thought it would be something to share . . . so here it is:

(more…)

Dateline: some time in the near future, in a newspaper of your choice: Kaplan to take over the educational system in the United States in an effort to make sure test scores are the best in the world!

I have been on a hiatus of sorts as I go back to school to earn a paralegal degree. My intent is to work within my state legislature to have an active role in the process of educational policy development and enactment. However, the combination of an article in USAToday, a blog post by Darren Draper (Technology Specialist in Utah), and another by Jeff Utecht (K-12 Technology Resource Facilitator at Shanghai American School in Shanghai, China) pulled me away from my practice in writing case briefs to write today.

(more…)

One of the most debilitating aspects of today’s educational environment is the fear of failure. No, I am not talking about students, I am talking about teachers and administrators. There is a constant fear of losing jobs, funding, the chance to do all they hoped they would by working the field of education, specifically . . . making a difference. This fear is the largest barrier to educational reform.

The obsessive focus on standardized testing, textbooks, and core curriculum has done more damage to the learning environment in the United States than just about anything else. It is as simple as the fact that, continually studying for a test just isn’t fun for students, nor does it engage their innate curiosity about life and the world around them . . . and much worse, it creates a permanent perception that school is a boring place, with educators (highly skilled professionals) primarily taking the blame.

(more…)

There are scouts, those who go ahead and explore the landscape and discover the possibilities. They are followed by early settlers who arrive immediately after and discover uses of the landscape and begin to build a new settlement. Following them are those who’ve heard the tales of a new world and made the decision to join the experiment. Those who remained behind had one of two options; ignore the new world developing out of their immediate sight, or become a facilitator for the development while maintaining the necessities and structures of the old settlements that supported the new.

This post started rattling around my head a couple of weeks ago while I was on the elliptical at the gym. I was reading Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means by Albert-Laszlo Barabasi while I was trying to sweat off the pounds accumulating while I read my RSS feeds. I had begun this book previously, but left it bookmarked on the shelf for quite a awhile, until a tweet by @bokardo (his blog) that eventually led me to his Amazon list of must read books. Linked was listed and I pulled it off the shelf and stared anew. I had begun the book before I was Twitterized, even before I started to seriously blog about EdTech. The book took on a new dimension this time and my brain went into overdrive as I considered it’s message in light of Twitter, Ning’s such as Classroom 2.0, Slideshare, Diigo, and the list goes on.

The more I read, the more I focused on my experience with my Twitter stream. I find my stream to be the place I discover much insight and wisdom, as well as information and directions to great ideas on the web. There is a large EdTech community within Twitter and the flow of information and exchange of ideas is far beyond anything I experienced as a classroom teacher for 20+ years. Since being Twitterized, I have often thought of a Tom Peters‘ quote I read in Re-imagine!: Business Excellence in a Disruptive Age,

A New Social Contract. Societies that educate their young to break the rules and invent vivid new futures.

(more…)

Sitting at Beans ‘n Cream having my morning tea and a tweet came through the stream . . . @mrplough07 linked to a new blog entry decrying his experience in a class he is taking as part of his EdTech masters work. He opened with his lament:

Something has been really bothering me lately. I’m taking a college course called Introduction to the Internet for Educators. When I first saw the title I was really excited because I figured the teacher would be teaching me all about how to use the Internet to help kids learn. However, thats not quite how it played out.

His post struck a chord that is constant with me so I had to reply (not to mention I appreciate @mrplough07’s Twitter stream and blog)

Cory,

You are spot on! This is one of the main reasons that technology continues to have little impact on education. It may empower tiny enclaves here and there – but it has not had the massive impact that it should. Your experience identifies one of the major reasons.

EdTech isn’t about coding, it’s about taking what coders have already done and empowering student learning and teachers professional growth. There are plenty of people out there already creating new and usable applications every day – teachers don’t need to worry about this. It is incumbent on EdTech leaders, like yourself, to continue to push the envelope and wildly imagine ways that these tools can open the learning architecture in your classroom.

True, it is beneficial to know the underlying ideas of coding and design – it’s even fun to play with on the side (and may help you see its power more clearly). However, it does not create a new vision of education and THAT is what your class should be doing, creating vision, opening new windows.

Here is the dichotomy, your in the choir and within this space are mostly choir members. How do we stop singing to the choir and go about creating a voice outside that will foster and nurture change? How do we release the potential energy of technology/the web so that it becomes a viable vehicle for true educational reinvention?

I found a simple definition of inertia , “An object that is not subject to any outside forces moves at a constant velocity, covering equal distances in equal times along a straight-line path.” Tech/the web is moving along slowly because so many are trying to “fit it in” or use it to simply to do what they are already doing, just differently. The power of Tech/the web is that we can use it to re-conceptualize our learning architectures so that they become powerful and visionary – creating what now doesn’t exist.

You are in a position to do that, to make a change where it is needed – be a revolutionary in your class . . . sing outside of the choir. And, not to sound too grandiose and melodramatic, then go on to teach these possibilities to those around you.

- Greg

Powered by ScribeFire and Beans ‘n Cream.

Next Page »