<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Assessment 2: A Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constructingmeaning.com/2009/12/23/thoughts-on-assessment-a-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constructingmeaning.com/2009/12/23/thoughts-on-assessment-a-conversation/</link>
	<description>~ rethinking school back to relevance ~</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 15:02:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on Assessment 3: Writing the obit on summative assessment &#171; Constructing Meaning</title>
		<link>http://constructingmeaning.com/2009/12/23/thoughts-on-assessment-a-conversation/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on Assessment 3: Writing the obit on summative assessment &#171; Constructing Meaning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructingmeaning.com/?p=236#comment-806</guid>
		<description>[...] Thoughts on Assessment 2: A conversation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thoughts on Assessment 2: A conversation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee / TeachMoore</title>
		<link>http://constructingmeaning.com/2009/12/23/thoughts-on-assessment-a-conversation/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee / TeachMoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructingmeaning.com/?p=236#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Thank you for helping us revisit the value of formative assessments. In the current testing-charged atmosphere, many teachers have allowed ourselves to be scared away from assessment. But I agree with that genuine evaluation is an essential part of every teacher&#039;s work. I&#039;d like to hear and think more about the possibilities of using formative assessments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for helping us revisit the value of formative assessments. In the current testing-charged atmosphere, many teachers have allowed ourselves to be scared away from assessment. But I agree with that genuine evaluation is an essential part of every teacher&#8217;s work. I&#8217;d like to hear and think more about the possibilities of using formative assessments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janwebb21</title>
		<link>http://constructingmeaning.com/2009/12/23/thoughts-on-assessment-a-conversation/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>janwebb21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructingmeaning.com/?p=236#comment-678</guid>
		<description>Hear, hear! Well said. Although in a primary school context (as I am in) I would still say that a portfolio of evidence built up throughout a unit/an opportunity to demonstrate application of the knowledge learnt is more (age-)appropriate than an end of unit, high-pressure assessment.  Using formative assessment to &quot;fill the gaps&quot; and develop pupils&#039; understanding is the MOST important part of our job as teachers, isn&#039;t it? As such, I think any assessment that doesn&#039;t put the emphasis on this pupil development is only paying lip-service to the term &quot;assessment&quot; and is ticking boxes put in place by the &quot;powers-that-be&quot;. And are we there to put ticks in boxes by completing an end of unit summative assessment, or to move our children&#039;s learning forward? I know what I aim to do and I think every other educator I have spoken to says the same (please forgive me if I am wrong and have mis-interpreted anything anyone has ever said to me!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear! Well said. Although in a primary school context (as I am in) I would still say that a portfolio of evidence built up throughout a unit/an opportunity to demonstrate application of the knowledge learnt is more (age-)appropriate than an end of unit, high-pressure assessment.  Using formative assessment to &#8220;fill the gaps&#8221; and develop pupils&#8217; understanding is the MOST important part of our job as teachers, isn&#8217;t it? As such, I think any assessment that doesn&#8217;t put the emphasis on this pupil development is only paying lip-service to the term &#8220;assessment&#8221; and is ticking boxes put in place by the &#8220;powers-that-be&#8221;. And are we there to put ticks in boxes by completing an end of unit summative assessment, or to move our children&#8217;s learning forward? I know what I aim to do and I think every other educator I have spoken to says the same (please forgive me if I am wrong and have mis-interpreted anything anyone has ever said to me!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
